Legal Opinion

Richard Albert Romero and Earl Roy Wallace v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1964No. 20698_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal in forma pauperis from an order of the district judge denying a Section 2255 petition. It is a very simple case in which the district judge erroneously construed the statute requiring a hearing on a Section 2255 petition and, based upon this misconstruction, denied the applicants the hearing which, upon the allegations of the motion, the statute requires. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to afford the applicants a hearing.

The error of the district judge arose out of his reliance on his interpretation of a recent Supreme Court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RobbinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Marvin Norman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  3. State v. ByrdNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Rowe v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
  5. Bobby Ray Gill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API