Legal Opinion

Hays v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1934No. 1019PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

The Producers’ National Bank of Tulsa, Okl., suspended business on July 14, 1930. The Comptroller of the Currency took charge of its assets on July 27th thereafter, and appointed a receiver for the purpose of liquidating them. Defendant owned thirty-five shares of capital stock in the bank. This suit was instituted in conventional manner to recover an alleged assessment of 100 per cent, against shareholders made by the Comptroller on the ensuing August 10th, pursuant to the provisions of law.

The amended answer contained a general denial, and in addition it was alleged…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Bushnell v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Wyman v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Lantry v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Central Republic Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936
  2. Houston v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Smith v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. Trustees of Somerset Academy v. PicherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API