Goldtree v. McAlister
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
— The judgment appealed from in this case was affirmed January 31, 1890. A rehearing was granted, and the case has been reargued in printed briefs.
*97We have carefully considered the arguments of the learned counsel for appellant on the rehearing, but find nothing in them having the effect to change the former opinion. It is true that section 5 of article 6 of the present constitution was inappropriately cited in that opinion to sustain the foreclosure sale, made before the present constitution was adopted; but the validity of that sale is supported by section 392 of the Code of Civil…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McGlynn & ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Duncan v. CobbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Halleck v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Luco v. Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Lucas v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In Re Estate of SankeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Duff v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.