Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Duff

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1917No. 1811PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). Having sustained appellee’s motion to strike from the record appellant’s bills of exceptions covering the action of the court in refusing its request to compel appel-lee to submit to an examination of his person by certain physicians named by it, on the ground that said bills were filed in the court below after the expiration of the time allowed by law, the assignments numbered 1, 2, 3, and 4, presenting the rulings of the court with reference to such request for review here, will not be considered. Criswell v. Robbins, 152 S. W. 210; Canal Co. v. Quinn,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Unknown Heirs of Criswell v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Pearce v. Supreme Lodge, Knights & Ladies of HonorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Loeb v. Texas N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Louisiana-Rio Grande Canal Co. v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Welsh v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Morgan v. SmartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Watt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API