Legal Opinion

Claim of Tauer v. Williams

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1952No. 2537PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Riner, Justice.

This case arose under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the State of Wyoming and to state the matter briefly its disposition rests upon the answer to the question — who was the employer of the injured workman at the time he suffered the injury subsequently herein described ? The workman himself is not involved in this controversy as will presently be seen.

The injury suffered by the workman as reported by the attending- physician upon the statement of the workman as to how the injury was sustained was “the workman’s right hand was caught in the cat head on the drilling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Fox Park Timber Co. v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dulaney v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Casper Motor Co. v. MarquisWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Wyoming Inv. Co. v. Wax Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Valentine v. Ormsbee Exploration Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Stratman v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. McGinnis v. General Petroleum CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Peters v. CampbellWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Chevron Oil Co. v. BarlowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API