Claim of Tauer v. Williams
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Riner, Justice.
This case arose under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the State of Wyoming and to state the matter briefly its disposition rests upon the answer to the question — who was the employer of the injured workman at the time he suffered the injury subsequently herein described ? The workman himself is not involved in this controversy as will presently be seen.
The injury suffered by the workman as reported by the attending- physician upon the statement of the workman as to how the injury was sustained was “the workman’s right hand was caught in the cat head on the drilling…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Fox Park Timber Co. v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- Dulaney v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Casper Motor Co. v. MarquisWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Wyoming Inv. Co. v. Wax Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- Valentine v. Ormsbee Exploration Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Stratman v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- McGinnis v. General Petroleum CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Peters v. CampbellWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Chevron Oil Co. v. BarlowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.