Legal Opinion
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided March 11, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-76PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOOD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a challenge by Plaintiffs MCI Telecommunications Corporation and MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc. (collectively “MCI”) of several aspects of an agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendant Bell-South Telecommunications, Inc. (hereinaf ter “BellSouth”). Said agreement was arbitrated by Defendant Kentucky Public Service Commission (hereinafter “PSC”) pursuant to the local competition provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-401, 110 Stat. 56 (hereinafter the “Act” or “1996 Act”).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- At & T Communications of Southern States, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. AppleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2000
- At&T Communications of Virginia, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- At&t Communications of Virginia, Incorporated, and MCI Telecommunications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation McImetro Access Transmission Services of Virginia, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation v. Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Incorporated Hullihen Williams Moore, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission I. Clinton Miller, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission Theodore v. Morrison, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission State Corporation Commission, Commonwealth of Virginia, and Richard Cullen, Attorney General of Virginia, Intervenor-Defendant, and Federal Communications Commission, Party in Interest. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation McImetro Access Transmission Services of Virginia, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation, and At&t Communications of Virginia, Incorporated, Intervenor-Plaintiff v. Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Incorporated Hullihen Williams Moore, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission I. Clinton Miller, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission Theodore v. Morrison, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission State Corporation Commission, Commonwealth of Virginia, and Richard Cullen, Attorney General of Virginia, Intervenor-Defendant, and Federal Communications Commission, Party in Interest. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation McImetro Access Transmission Services of Virginia, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation At&t Communications of Virginia, Incorporated v. Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Incorporated, and Hullihen Williams Moore, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission I. Clinton Miller, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission Theodore v. Morrison, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission State Corporation Commission, Commonwealth of Virginia, and Richard Cullen, Attorney General of Virginia, Intervenor-Defendant, and Federal Communications Commission, Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.