Horning v. E. Griesbach Brewing Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Superior Court of MiVwcmkee County. On January 11, 1892, plaintiff procured a judgment to be entered on a note and warrant of attorney executed by defendant, Brandt, and on the same day procured to be issued thereon an execution, by virtue of which the sheriff levied upon certain property of the judgment debtor.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Superior Court of MiVwcmkee County. On January 11, 1892, plaintiff procured a judgment to be entered on a note and warrant of attorney executed by defendant, Brandt, and on the same day procured to be issued thereon an execution, by virtue of which the sheriff levied upon certain property of the judgment debtor. The K Griesbach Brewing Company, a creditor of Brandt, commenced an action against him on the same day, and obtained a writ of attachment therein, which was levied upon the same goods in the hands of the sheriff under plaintiff’s execution. The brewing company, having…
1Opinion of the CourtLyom, C. J.
The errors in entering up judgment on the note and warrant of attorney are not jurisdictional, but only irregularities, not affecting the jurisdiction of the court to render the judgment. The petitioner has failed to show any equitable grounds entitling him to be relieved therefrom or from the execution. The case is not distinguishable from that of Marshall & I. Bank v. Milwaukee Worsted Mills, ante, p. 23, and hence is ruled by it.
By the Court.— Order affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- John V. Farwell Co. v. HilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Co. v. FalkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Reeves v. KrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Husman v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947