Legal Opinion

Kluth v. Lane

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1914Published

Error to District Court, Guadalupe County; M. Kennon, Judge. Suit by Herman Kluth against W. P. Lane, State Comptroller. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarl, J.

On March 6, 1913, defendant in error, W. P. Lane, Comptroller of the state of Texas, rescinded and canceled the retail malt liquor dealer’s license of Herman Kluth, plaintiff in error. The license was canceled by the Comptroller upon the return of evidence taken before J. S. Slaughter, a notary public in and for Guadalupe county, in pursuance of section 9, c. 17, of the Acts of the Thirty-First Legislature (1st Ex. Sess.). Subsequent to the cancellation of the license, on May 2, 1913, plaintiff in error filed suit, as the aggrieved party, in the district court of Guadalupe county to reinstate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashford v. GoodwinTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lane v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Lane v. HewgleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API