Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Fahringer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 21, 1988No. 2 CA-SA 88-0072PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

The sole issue in this special action is the constitutionality of an affirmative defense to claims against public entities created by the legislature in A.R.S. § 12-820.03(2), which precludes liability for certain injuries attributable to the fault of a person driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Because petitioners have no adequate remedy by appeal and the question involves significant issues of law arising from a statute not previously interpreted, we assume jurisdiction. Ariz.R.P.Spec. Action 1, 17A A.R.S.; City of Tucson v. Fleischman, 152 Ariz.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Tucson v. FahringerArizona Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API