Commonwealth v. Gallagher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY*.
The question presented in this appeal is whether the offense of luring a child, 18 Pa.C.S. § 2910, is a strict liability crime *264with regard to the age of the victim. The Superior Court concluded that § 2910 was not a strict liability crime with regard to the age of the victim and that the Commonwealth had to prove that Appellee Terrence Gallagher acted knowingly, recklessly, or negligently under 18 Pa.C.S. § 302 with regard to the victim’s age. Commonwealth v. Gallagher, 874 A.2d 49, 50 (Pa.Super.2005). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the order of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BusanetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. KakhankhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. GiordanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. Moran, ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.