Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gallagher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 2007No. 167 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY*.

The question presented in this appeal is whether the offense of luring a child, 18 Pa.C.S. § 2910, is a strict liability crime *264with regard to the age of the victim. The Superior Court concluded that § 2910 was not a strict liability crime with regard to the age of the victim and that the Commonwealth had to prove that Appellee Terrence Gallagher acted knowingly, recklessly, or negligently under 18 Pa.C.S. § 302 with regard to the victim’s age. Commonwealth v. Gallagher, 874 A.2d 49, 50 (Pa.Super.2005). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the order of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. BusanetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. KakhankhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. GiordanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. Moran, ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API