Legal Opinion
DeMoya v. Mosely
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 31, 1988No. Nos. 87-630, 87-1281Published
1Per curiam
Affirmed. See and compare Smith v. Piezo Technology and Professional Administrators, 427 So.2d 182 (Fla.1983); Mosely v. DeMoya, 497 So.2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Nob Hill Associates, 450 So.2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), cert denied, 458 So.2d 274 (Fla.1984); Winchester Corporation v. Miami Free Zone Corporation, 443 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Buckner v. Lower Florida Keys Hospital District, 403 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ethyl Corp. v. Balter, 386 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); cert. denied, 392 So.2d 1371 (Fla.1981); Catania v. Eastern…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Joseph L. Dombrowski v. Jack Dowling and Arthur Rubloff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Chester C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/appellees. Summa Corporation, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/appellants v. Chester C. Davis, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Ethyl Corp. v. BalterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Smith v. Piezo Technology & Prof. Adm'rsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.