Legal Opinion
Silverman v. Villegas
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 2008No. 49A02-0708-CV-754PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Case Summary and Issue
Three illegal aliens instituted a class action against the Commissioner of the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles (“BMV”) claiming they were unable to obtain State of Indiana driver’s licenses and/or identification cards because of identification requirements implemented by the BMV on July 15, 2002. In a prior appeal, this court held that the identification requirements constituted an administrative rule, which was void because it was not promulgated pursuant to the Indiana Administrative Rules and Procedures Act (“ARPA”). We therefore instructed the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Guy v. Wyo. Dep't of Corr.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- John Lane-El v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Silverman v. VillegasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008