Legal Opinion

Gerstein v. Smirl

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1945No. Civ. 14799PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages allegedly sustained by him in an automobile accident as the result of defendant’s negligence. By her answer defendant denied any negligence upon her part, alleged contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff, and by cross-complaint sought to recover damages allegedly suffered by her in the same accident. Upon trial of the action, the jury returned a verdict denying relief to both parties under their respective pleadings. Defendant filed a memorandum of costs and disbursements, and judgment was entered upon the verdict that plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Gorman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Shelley v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ferraro v. Southern California Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc. v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Syverson v. HeitmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Schrader v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Stanley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API