Legal Opinion
North American Specialty Insurance v. Britt Paulk Insurance Agency, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 14, 2007No. 06-CV-215-JHPPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES H. PAYNE, District Judge.
Now before the Court is Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, Argenia, Inc.’s (“Argenia”), Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 84), Plaintiffs, North American Specialty Insurance Company’s (“NAS”), Response to said motion, and Argenia’s Reply.
In general, summary judgment is proper where the pleadings depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). An issue of fact is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gray v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Niemeyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. A.A.R. Western Skyways, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- RICHARDS v. FOREMOST INSURANCE CO. v. BROWN & SON MOBILE HOME SVC, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2026