Legal Opinion

Gonzalez-Burgueno v. National Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 23, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4296PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*384OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of National Indemnity Company’s motion to intervene in the underlying tort action wherein Rudolfo Gonzalez-Burgueno is the plaintiff and The Esquire for Men, Inc., et al., are defendants. The trial court also denied a motion to set aside a judgment for $200,000 entered against the defendants and in favor of the plaintiff. That motion was filed by attorney Arthur Miller for National Indemnity but in the name of the defendants The Esquire for Men, Behar and Singer. This appeal is also from the denial of that motion.

This…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koven v. Saberdyne Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Salvatierra v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PaynterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Kellner v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Weaver v. Synthes, Ltd.(USA)Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API