Legal Opinion
Sosa v. Hiraoka
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 9, 1988No. CV-F-87-461 RECPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS/STRIKE
COYLE, District Judge.
On October 17, 1988, the court heard defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. Upon due consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties, the court now enters its order granting defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
Defendants move, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss plaintiff’s action on the grounds that as a matter of law the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. In addition defendants move, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sosa v. HiraokaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sosa v. HiraokaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Garus v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- Maddox v. County of San MateoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990