Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Chesebro-Whitman Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

F. Dana Winslow, J.

Motion by defendant, Chesebro-Whitman Co., a Division of Patent Scaffolding Co., Harsco Corp. (C-W Co.), for leave to amend its answer to assert a Statute of Limitations defense as to plaintiffs’ warranty claim, and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it, is determined as follows:

Cross motion by defendant, Allied Building Products Corp. (Allied), for: (1) leave to amend its answer to assert a Statute of Limitations defense with respect to plaintiffs’ warranty cause of action; (2) summary judgment dismissing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Phoenix Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Fulford v. Baker Perkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Clarkin v. Staten Island University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Seda v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API