Legal Opinion

Seda v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1992PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered July 24, 1990, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for leave to amend its answer to include the defense of the Statute of Limitations and to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, reversed, on the law, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed, without costs.

Although defendant New York City Housing Authority *470(NYCHA) waited more than three years to raise the defense of Statute of Limitations, leave to amend pleadings is to be freely given absent prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Addesso v. ShemtobNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cseh v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Konik Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Kevorkian v. HarringtonNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Antwerpse Diamantbank N.V. v. NisselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. McGaulley v. Telling, Kelting & Potter, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API