Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Peacock

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 3, 1990No. 19-03687PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEBTOR’S MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULE B-4

JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Debtor Stewart S. Peacock (“Debtor”) has moved to amend his Exemption Schedule B-4 (the “Motion”). Debtor now seeks to claim as exempt from the bankruptcy estate certain property which was not exempt at the time Debtor filed his original schedule. His Motion is brought under 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(2)(A) and recently enacted Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 110, 1112-1006. Trustee Joseph Stein (“Trustee”) and Gordon Buchanan, Jr. (“Buchanan”), a secured creditor of the estate, oppose Debtor’s proposed amendments.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lasich v. Estate of Wickstrom (In Re Wickstrom)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
  4. Clare (Michael J.) v. S.S.S. Of Kentucky, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Schechter v. Balay (In Re Balay)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re AllardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  2. In Re FranklinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. In Re RhodesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  4. Tanzi v. Comerica Bank-California (In Re Tanzi)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Jenkins v. HodesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API