Legal Opinion

Pyle v. Estate of Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff *821and defendants each appeal from an order granting in part plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment. The order declared that defendants are owners in fee of parcels bounded on the west by the low water mark of Cayuga Lake and that plaintiff is an upland riparian owner. The order also declared that plaintiffs exercise of his riparian rights may not unreasonably interfere with defendants’ rights as owners of land between the high and low water marks of the lake. The court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Lehigh Valley Railroad v. PyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Citizens Developers of Oneonta, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Stutchin v. Town of HuntingtonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  3. Miller v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API