Legal Opinion

Marr Oil Heat Mach. Corp. v. Hardinge Bros.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 15, 1927No. 4845PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIND LEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, owner and licensee, respectively, of patent to King, No. 1,158,058, issued October 26, 1925, charge defendant Hardinge Bros., Inc., with infringement, and pray for an injunction and an accounting. The answer asserts invalidity and noninfringement. Plaintiffs rely upon claims 1, 2, 5, and 10 of King, which arc set forth in the margin.1

*242King describes an oil burner, consisting of an open cup centrifugal atomizer fixed upon a hollow driving shaft arranged vertically. The sides of the cup slope slightly outwardly from the bottom to the top and culminate in an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Gray Telephone Pay Station Co. v. Baird Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
  4. United Shirt & Collar Co. v. BeattieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  5. Brown v. Huntington Piano Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Armour & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1950
  2. Belander v. PedroDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API