Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Ford
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Replevin. Defendant Eord brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
On September 7, 1888, defendant Rathbun and one Alison D. Elory were partners, and carrying on business at Grand Rapids. On that day Elory sold to defendant Eord all his right, title, and interest in and to the partnership property, and executed a bill of sale of the same. Eord assumed the undivided firm debts. Defendant Rathbun indorsed his consent to this arrangement in the following language:
“-I hereby consent to within sale from Alison D. Elory to George R. Eord, and consent to said Ford to stand in the place and stead of said Flory.-’-’
On September 10, defendant Rathbun executed to…
2Cited by5 opinions
- West Coast Grocery Co. v. StinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Robards v. WatermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Beckman v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Boyle v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith-Powers Logging Co. v. BernittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916