Legal Opinion

Buelow v. Madlock

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 13, 2005No. CA 04-898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terry Crabtree, Judge.

After a bench trial, appellee Kenneth Madlock was granted judgment in the amount of $12,563.65 on his claim of negligence against appellants Steve Buelow and his insurance agency. Buelow raises three issues on appeal. He contends: (1) that the trial court erred in imposing a duty upon him to review appellee’s prior policies and inspect the premises before placing coverage; (2) that appellee’s claims were barred by the statute of limitations; and (3) that the trial court’s findings of negligence were clearly erroneous. We find merit in appellant’s first issue and reverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hardt v. BrinkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1961
  2. Sintros v. HamonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. Mans v. Peoples Bank of ImbodenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Chavers v. Epsco, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Costner v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tiara Condominium Ass'n v. Marsh, USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
  2. Farm Credit Midsouth, PCA v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. I Square Management, LLC v. McGriff Insurance Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  4. I Square Management LLC v. McGriff Insurance Services IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021
  5. United States Liability Insurance Company v. Stone County Insurance Agency IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API