Legal Opinion

State v. Mavrogianis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1982No. 8110SC894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

In the search of the defendant’s automobile illicit drugs were found and seized by law enforcement officers. The drugs seized, if offered and admitted in evidence, would be tangible support for conviction of the defendant on some if not all of the charges against him. The trial court ruled that the evidence seized must be excluded because it violated the Fourth Amendment protection against “unreasonable” searches and seizures. The basis for the ruling was that the affidavit supporting the search warrant, relying on an informant’s tip, did not state sufficient underlying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. WashburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. O'KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API