Fisher v. South Carolina Department of Mental Retardation-Coastal Center
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
Appellant, Fisher, seeks additional benefits under South Carolina Workmen s Compensation Law after making a compromise settlement with a third-party tort-feasor without the consent of the carrier. The single commissioner, full commission, and circuit court agree the claimant, Fisher, elected a remedy against a third party without compliance with § 42-1-560 of the S. C. Code of Laws (1976), and, having done so, has no further remedy under the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act. We agree and affirm.
Fisher was injured in a fall at a Sears, Roebuck & Company store while…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stroy v. Millwood Drug Store, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- South Carolina Insurance v. EstradaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kimmer v. Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Talley v. John-Mansville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Callahan v. Beaufort County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Hardee v. Bruce Johnson Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Johnson v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.