State v. Arth
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
87 P.3d 1206 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
RONALD F. Arth, Appellant.
No. 51801-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
April 19, 2004.
Eric Nielson, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Carla Carlstrom, King Co Pros Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
AGID, J.
Appellant Ronald Arth appeals his conviction of first degree malicious mischief. He contends the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the law of self-defense when he argued at trial that he damaged a vehicle only in an effort to prevent the driver from injuring him with the car. We conclude that the self-defense…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. PonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. JanesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AcostaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- v. CoahranColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- State Of Washington, Respondent/cr-appellant v. Jesse Randall Ackerman, Appellant/cr-respondentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- D.M.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- DML v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- State of Iowa v. Brandon Scott StevensCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.