Legal Opinion

Mai v. Supercell Oy

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 20, 2021No. 5:20-cv-05573Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 PETER MAI, Case No. 5:20-cv-05573-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 10 v. 11 SUPERCELL OY, Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiff Peter Mai brings this putative class action against Defendant Supercell Oy 15 (“Supercell”) asserting the following claims: (1) unlawful and unfair business practices in 16 violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law,

Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.; (2) 17 violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”),

Cal. Civ. Code…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API