Legal Opinion

Pentagen Technologies International Ltd. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 29, 2000No. 98 CIV. 1090(JES)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Pentagen Technologies International Limited (“Pentagen”) and Russell D. Varnado (collectively “plaintiffs”) bring the instant action alleging violations of the Federal False Claims Act (“False Claims Act”) and abuse of process by defendants United States of America (“United States”), E.F. Brasseur (“Brasseur”) 1 (collectively “United States defendants”), CACI International Inc. (“CACI Interna tional”), CACI Systems Integration, Inc. (“CACI Systems”), CACI, Inc. — Federal (“CACI Federal”), International Business Machines…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pentagen Technologies International Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Runaway Development Group, S.A. v. Pentagen Technologies International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Pentagen Technologies International Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Yitzchok Shteierman v. Hillel Fisher, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API