Legal Opinion

Alaimo v. Alaimo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Subsequent to filing the notice of appeal from an order directing equitable distribution of the marital estate, a final judgment of divorce was entered, incorporating the directives of that order. This appeal should have been taken from the final judgment, not the earlier order (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988). We exercise our discretion to treat the notice of appeal as one taken from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]; Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hughes v. NussbaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Heine v. HeineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Kobylack v. KobylackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Anglin v. AnglinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Cleary v. ClearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strang v. StrangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Spencer v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Rheinstein v. RheinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API