Legal Opinion

State v. Stichtenoth

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided May 15, 1909Published

1Opinion of the CourtBromwell, J.

On March 31, 1909, the grand jury of this county reported an indictment of embezzlement against William Stichtenoth.

On April 9, 1909, the defendant filed a plea in abatement in the following words:

“Now comes the defendant, William Stichtenoth, and says that the State of Ohio ought not further to prosecute the indictment herein against him, because he says that during the deliberations of the grand jury at the January Term, 1909, of Hamilton county, Ohio, by which grand jury the indictment here was returned against this defendant, that Henry T. Hunt, the prosecuting attorney of Hamilton…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  2. State v. BakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. United States v. WellsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1908
  4. Charge to Grand JuryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1872
  5. Commonwealth v. BradneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API