Legal Opinion

Binks v. Collier

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 21, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00078Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ANDREW BINKS, Case No. 1:20-cv-78 Plaintiff, McFarland, J. Litkovitz, M.J. v. KAREN L. COLLIER, et al., REPORT AND Defendants. RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Andrew Binks brings this action pro se against defendants Karen and Tomas Collier1 alleging breach of contract, fraud, obstruction, witness tampering, malicious prosecution, perjury, violations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), wire fraud, and mail fraud. (Doc. 1).2 This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API