Goldman v. Goldman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lo-bis, J.), entered on or about June 5, 1995, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 based on a judgment of Passaic County Superior Court, Probate Division, New Jersey, unanimously affirmed, with costs to be paid by defendant-appellant personally.
Contrary to defendant’s contention, Matter of Pearson v Pearson (69 NY2d 919) does not bar discretionary enforcement of nonfinal foreign decrees (see, Mittenthal v Mittenthal, 99 Misc 2d 778), but merely limits enforcemt of foreign…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pearson v. PearsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mittenthal v. MittenthalNew York Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Goldman v. Estate of GoldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000