Legal Opinion

Grant v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 9, 1947No. 31720PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

We have set out the evidence to show that it amply sustains the conviction under the allegations of the accusation.

This brings us, then, to determine whether or not the court erred in overruling the general demurrer. In other words, whether the accusation set out a criminal offense under the Code, § 26-6502, which reads as follows: “Any person who, by himself or another, shall keep, maintain,N employ, or carry on any lottery or other scheme or device for the hazarding of any money or valuable things, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” A scheme or device for the hazarding of money as charged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meyer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Sable v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Russell v. Equitable Loan & Security Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Sparks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monte Carlo Parties, Ltd. v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. California Attorney General Opinion 23-1001, California Attorney General Reports2025
  3. Day v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. White v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API