Legal Opinion

Brady v. Dandridge

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 1989No. 77923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Susanne and Ralph Dandridge brought suit against Re/Max Northeast, Inc., Gwinnett, a real estate brokerage firm, and Harold Brady, a Re/Max sales associate, for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud arising out of a listing contract for the sale of their residence. The trial court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and we granted their application for interlocutory appeal.

The record reveals that on May 31, 1985 appellees entered into a contract to purchase a residence owned by Bo Mohr, which was listed by appellants, contingent upon the sale of appellees’ house.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Walls, Inc. v. Atlantic Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Randall v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Dolvin Realty Company v. HolleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Wood v. Dan P. Holl & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Legion v. Foote & Davies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Ikola v. SchoeneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Hari & Associates v. RNBC, INC.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
  4. Rayborn v. LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API