Legal Opinion

United States v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 27, 1976No. 73 C 2080, 70 C 2220, 73 C 1252 and 75 C 79PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

MARSHALL, District Judge.

On February 2, 1976, we entered a final decree pursuant to Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., which adjudicated certain of the issues in these consolidated cases. No party sought modification or amendment of the decree. Rule 59(a) and (e), Fed.R.Civ.P. Appeals have been taken by the Buraurer intervening plaintiffs and the Arado and Isakson intervening defendants and we are advised that those appeals are to be heard during the week of June 14.

On February 17, the Arado intervening defendants (who hold places on the 1973 sergeants promotion list) moved to stay…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crockett v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. Crockett v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of Arcadia, Fla.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1978
  2. United States v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
  3. United States of America v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. United States of America v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API