Legal Opinion

Clifton Mfg. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 7, 1937No. 43149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The overpayment in question is admitted and there is no claim on behalf of the defendant of any error or mistake in its determination. Plaintiff insists that there was an account stated in its favor by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for $103,192.44, only $60,829.42 of which he paid. Counsel for the defendant take the position that there was no account stated in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of $42,363.02 here sought to be recovered. In this we think counsel are in error.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue clearly and positively stated the account. for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daube v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Shipley Construction & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  3. Wood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  4. Gage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Olds & Whipple, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  2. Blue Jay Lumber Co. Sv. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  3. Weinburg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API