Legal Opinion

Parlato v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1983No. 65740PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action against MARTA and its contractor, Expressway Constructors, to recover for physical damage, vandalism, and loss of commercial use of their buildings allegedly caused by construction of a subway under the street abutting the buildings. The parties stipulated that Expressway “was engaged at all times material to this action as prime contractor in the area of the property which is the subject of this action.” It was also stipulated that “[l]oss of lateral support combined with other incidents of construction caused physical damage to the property,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riddle v. DriebeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Tony v. PollardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Abercrombie v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. McKinnon v. TrivettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Melman v. FIA Card Services, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Sullivan v. FabeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Abrahamsen v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Brown v. Apollo Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API