Legal Opinion

Tinkle v. Sweeney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1903No. 1242PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Question certified from the- Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District in an appeal from Grayson County.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This is a certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District. The statement and question is as follows:

“Appellant brought this suit against M. J. Sweeney, as principal, and C. C. McCarthy and R. S. Legate, as sureties, on a liquor dealer’s bond, for permitting appellant’s minor son to enter and remain.in said Sweeney’s saloon and for selling him intoxicating liquors.
“The facts are that M. J. Sweeney, as a liquor dealer, executed a liquor dealer’s bond under the statute with the parties above named as sureties. The minor, Fred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Peacock v. LimburgerTexas Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Norcross v. B. L. Roberts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Texas Liquor Control Board v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. White v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Molinari v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Odom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API