Legal Opinion
Tinkle v. Sweeney
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1903No. 1242PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Question certified from the- Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District in an appeal from Grayson County.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Chief Justice.
This is a certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District. The statement and question is as follows:
“Appellant brought this suit against M. J. Sweeney, as principal, and C. C. McCarthy and R. S. Legate, as sureties, on a liquor dealer’s bond, for permitting appellant’s minor son to enter and remain.in said Sweeney’s saloon and for selling him intoxicating liquors.
“The facts are that M. J. Sweeney, as a liquor dealer, executed a liquor dealer’s bond under the statute with the parties above named as sureties. The minor, Fred…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baldwin v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Peacock v. LimburgerTexas Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by13 opinions
- Norcross v. B. L. Roberts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Texas Liquor Control Board v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- White v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Molinari v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Odom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.