State Ex Rel. City of Algoma v. Peterson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
One phase of this controversy was before this court in a prior action and is reported in Algoma v. Peterson (1939), 233 Wis. 82, 288 N. W. 809. Upon the former appeal the merits were not reached for the reason that the city was held to be without power to bring the action, and the complaint was dismissed. Thereupon the city council authorized the commencement of the present action. The first action was commenced July 11, 1938. An interim zoning-ordinance was passed by the city of Algoma on August 5, 1938. A permanent zoning ordinance was passed by the city of Algoma June 8, 1939. Both…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Wasilewski v. BiedrzyckiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Wadhams Oil Co. v. City of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Ballstadt v. PagelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. American Oil Co. v. BessentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Cabassa v. RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
- Cabassa v. Ramón RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
- State Ex Rel. American Oil Co. v. BessentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965