Legal Opinion
Huffman v. Stone
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1971No. 70-399PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per C%iriam.
The sole question presented is whether the expert witness’ opinion testimony concerning the cause of appellant’s losing control of his vehicle was properly ruled admissible by the trial court.
*160The function of expert opinion testimony is well-stated in paragraph one of the syllabus in McKay Machine Co. v. Rodman (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 77, 228 N. E. 2d 304, which reads:
“In all proceedings involving matters of a scientific, mechanical, professional or other like nature, requiring special study, experience or observation not within the common knowledge of laymen, expert opinion…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McKay Machine Co. v. RodmanOhio Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MinorOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Trebotich v. BroglioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Halley v. Grant Trucking, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fry v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011