Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Stone

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1971No. 70-399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per C%iriam.

The sole question presented is whether the expert witness’ opinion testimony concerning the cause of appellant’s losing control of his vehicle was properly ruled admissible by the trial court.

*160The function of expert opinion testimony is well-stated in paragraph one of the syllabus in McKay Machine Co. v. Rodman (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 77, 228 N. E. 2d 304, which reads:

“In all proceedings involving matters of a scientific, mechanical, professional or other like nature, requiring special study, experience or observation not within the common knowledge of laymen, expert opinion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKay Machine Co. v. RodmanOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MinorOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Trebotich v. BroglioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Halley v. Grant Trucking, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Fry v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API