Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Foretich
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1987No. 86-1137PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
In Morgan v. Foretich, 521 A.2d 248 (D.C.1987) [Morgan I], we recognized the qualified due process right of a civil con-temnor facing incarceration to a public hearing in a child custody and visitation rights dispute. We remanded the record to have the trial court reassess its decision to close a civil contempt hearing in light of our opinion. Today, we hold that the findings made by the trial court in response to our opinion are adequate to permit appellate review and to support its decision to close the hearing. In addition, we decide the remaining issues that we…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Publicker Industries, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Howard L. Criden, Harry P. Jannotti, Louis C. Johanson, George X. Schwartz. Appeal of Philadelphia Newspapers, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Melchor De Los SantosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. John Doe, James RoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Tinsley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Foretich v. CBS, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Morgan v. ForetichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Morgan v. ForetichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.