Legal Opinion
Ming Dai v. Jefferson Sessions
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 2018No. 15-70776PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MING DAI, No. 15-70776 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A205-555-836 JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted October 13, 2017* San Francisco, California Filed March 8, 2018 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Circuit Judge, and Stephen Reinhardt and Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Reinhardt; Dissent by Judge Trott * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mario Ernesto Navas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lydia Garcia-Milian v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cecilia Aguilar Fermin v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Garland v. Ming DaiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Delphine Arrey v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Chanpreet Kaur v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Carla Davila v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.