Legal Opinion

Douglas Stankewitz v. Robert Wong

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 29, 2012No. 10-99001PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge FISHER; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether Douglas R. Stankewitz received ineffective assistance of counsel at the penalty phase of his capital murder trial. In a prior appeal in this matter, we held that Stankewitz’s allega*1165tions that his counsel failed to investigate and present readily available mitigation evidence — including evidence of his deprived and abusive upbringing, potential mental illness, long history of substance abuse and use of substantial quantities of drugs leading up to the murder — if true, would establish that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. John Doe v. Robert Ayers, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Pedro Vega v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Breton v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Demarcus Sears v. Warden GDCPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  5. Gregory Demetrulias v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API