Legal Opinion

Duke v. Town of Huntington

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter Fox Cohalan, J.

This motion by plaintiff for summary judgment striking defendant’s answer on the ground that there is no defense to the cause of action alleged in the complaint, is granted.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment that a certain Local Law No. 2 of 1990, enacted by defendant, which imposed *522a "temporary” restriction upon the construction of any docks in town waterways until 60 days after the date of the adoption of a local waterfront revitalization plan, or May 20, 1991, whichever would be earlier, is void and of no effect. Relief is also sought to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Shepard v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. People Ex Rel. St. Albans-Springfield Corp. v. ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cellular Telephone Co. v. Village of TarrytownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API