McNeill v. McDougald
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*259PaeKee, J.
When a verdict is set aside for error in law, and not as a matter of discretion, the aggrieved party may appeal, provided the error is specifically designated. Akin v. Bank, 227 N.C. 453, 42 S.E. 2d 518; Powers v. City of Wilmington, 177 N.C. 361, 99 S.E. 102. Here, the Trial Judge stated that he set the verdict aside, and granted a new trial on the ground that he inadvertently failed to charge the law as contained in G.S. 44-63. This suffices for the appeal.
G.S. 44-63 reads: “If any person in the counties mentioned in the preceding section,”- — the county where the tobacco crop…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Spencer v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Bowen v. . SchnibbenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Kolman v. . SilbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Barnes v. CaulbourneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Matter of Will of MaynardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- In Re the Will of HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Westmoreland v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.