Legal Opinion

McNeill v. McDougald

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1955No. 598PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*259PaeKee, J.

When a verdict is set aside for error in law, and not as a matter of discretion, the aggrieved party may appeal, provided the error is specifically designated. Akin v. Bank, 227 N.C. 453, 42 S.E. 2d 518; Powers v. City of Wilmington, 177 N.C. 361, 99 S.E. 102. Here, the Trial Judge stated that he set the verdict aside, and granted a new trial on the ground that he inadvertently failed to charge the law as contained in G.S. 44-63. This suffices for the appeal.

G.S. 44-63 reads: “If any person in the counties mentioned in the preceding section,”- — the county where the tobacco crop…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spencer v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Bowen v. . SchnibbenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Kolman v. . SilbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Barnes v. CaulbourneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Matter of Will of MaynardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. In Re the Will of HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Westmoreland v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API