Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 13, 1999No. 97-3270PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case requires us to determine whether two separate vehicles traveling in tandem and causing a single automobile accident constitutes one or two “occurrences” for purposes of insurance policy indemnification for the victim. Because we find no definitive Florida precedent for this insurance policy language interpretation issue, we certify the question to the Supreme Court of Florida.

I. FACTS

On December 7, 1996, appellant Karen Anderson was a passenger in a Mazda Miata convertible automobile traveling southbound in the left lane of Interstate 75. A tractor-trailer rig, comprised of a 1987…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mary P. Dahl-Eimers v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Key v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Berkshire Life Ins. Co. v. AdelbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  5. Suh v. DennisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Mosquito Control District of Florida v. Coregis InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API