Legal Opinion
Pina v. McGill Development Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 14, 1983PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.
This case and Pina v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., post 1001 (1983), arise out of an injury suffered by the plaintiff, Esther G. Pina, when she fell as she was leaving work. After her employer’s insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual), paid workmen’s compensation benefits to Pina, she brought an action in tort against her employer’s lessor, McGill Development Corporation (McGill), alleging that she was injured as a result of negligent maintenance of the parking lot outside her place of employment. In October, 1979, a jury awarded the plaintiff damages in the sum of $125,000. A…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Assmann v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Lockwood v. BowlesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Deerskin Trading Post, Inc. v. Spencer Press, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Parrell v. KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Powers v. H.B. Smith Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Sahin v. SahinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- DeJesus v. YogelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.