United States v. Howard Dale Bernard, United States of America v. Ralph Maurice Comstock, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Bernard and Comstock appeal from judgments of conviction of conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine, a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. They were separately indicted and tried together. An un-indicted co-conspirator, one Richard May, was the major witness to criminal activity on the part of the appellants.
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
I. The Facts.
In December 1977, on behalf of an agricultural research firm, Bernard ordered from the Physicians and Surgeons Supply House in Spokane, Washington some me-thylamine, a chemical that it is not unlawful to order,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. HoulihanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Koubriti v. ConvertinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. S. Mohammad MarashiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ronald Olen BurrowsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.