Legal Opinion

United States v. Howard Dale Bernard, United States of America v. Ralph Maurice Comstock, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1980No. 79-1356, 79-1357PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Bernard and Comstock appeal from judgments of conviction of conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine, a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. They were separately indicted and tried together. An un-indicted co-conspirator, one Richard May, was the major witness to criminal activity on the part of the appellants.

We reverse and remand for a new trial.

I. The Facts.

In December 1977, on behalf of an agricultural research firm, Bernard ordered from the Physicians and Surgeons Supply House in Spokane, Washington some me-thylamine, a chemical that it is not unlawful to order,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. HoulihanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Koubriti v. ConvertinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. S. Mohammad MarashiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Ronald Olen BurrowsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API