Legal Opinion
Benita Moore v. Security-Connecticut Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1998No. 96-17092Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
139 F.3d 906
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Benita MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECURITY-CONNECTICUT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-17092.
DC No. CV-95-3681-WHO/JBS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1997.
Decided Feb. 19, 1998.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Frasch v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Palmer v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.