Divide Canal & Reservoir Co. v. Tenney
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Larimer District Court. — Hon. Harry P. Gamble, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
Appellee, as plaintiff, brought suit against appellant, as defendant. His complaint included several causes of action. There was judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.
The first cause of action was to quiet plaintiff’s title to an interest which he claimed in water delivered by means of the Columbine ditch, and was based on a contract between plaintiff and the Divide Ditch Company, dated November 21st, 1901, wherein it was recited that the ditch company, in consideration of certain acts therein specified to be performed by plaintiff, agreed to deliver him, free of all expense, water…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Truesdail v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by9 opinions
- Western Motor Rebuilders, Inc. v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Teratron General v. Institutional Investors TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Gray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- In Re New York Deli, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1987
- Kelley v. South Jeffco Metropolitan Recreation & Park DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.